[arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...)
cgrundemann at gmail.com
Thu Feb 17 19:54:30 CST 2011
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:17, Benson Schliesser <bensons at queuefull.net> wrote:
> If you have more experience (not including rumors) that suggests otherwise, I'd very much like to hear about it. I'm open to the possibility that NAT444 breaks stuff - that feels right in my gut - but I haven't found any valid evidence of this.
In case you have not already found this:
> Regardless, I think we can agree that IPv6 is the way to avoid NAT-related growing pains. We've known this for a long time.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the NANOG