IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

John Curran jcurran at istaff.org
Thu Feb 17 11:51:28 CST 2011

On Feb 17, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:

>> 240/4 has been enabled in Linux since 2.6.25 (applied on January 21,
>> 2008 by David Miller) so that's like three years already.
> Yep, and that's great.  Let me know when a Cisco 7600 will route a
> packet like this.

So, it won't work for you.  Is there any reason that it shouldn't 
be defined as unicast or private use (with warnings) rather than 
"Future Use", so that those who might have a use for it can do so?


More information about the NANOG mailing list