quietly....

Jack Bates jbates at brightok.net
Tue Feb 15 11:38:43 CST 2011


On 2/15/2011 11:28 AM, David Israel wrote:
> They don't want the protocol tied to how things work today; it needs to
> be open to innovation and variety. And part of that is that an address
> needs to be just an address, with no other significance other than being
> unique and routable.  The moment an address has any significance beyond
> the network layer, it's a liability waiting to happen.

+1

The rare exception being multicast. :)


Jack




More information about the NANOG mailing list