Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Tue Feb 15 04:08:01 CST 2011
On 14 feb 2011, at 6:46, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Requiring them to be on certain well known addresses is restrictive and
> creates an unnecessary digression from IPv4 practice. It's comments like
> this that raise the hair on admins' necks. At least mine.
I don't get this. Why spend cycles discovering a value that doesn't need to change?
But I lost this argument in the IETF years ago, so I guess I'm relatively alone here.
More information about the NANOG