"Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers
Bill Woodcock
woody at pch.net
Sat Feb 5 18:17:29 UTC 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 5, 2011, at 11:22 AM, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> ARIN's community certinly is dominated by a particular type of network operator.
It's dominated by the type of network operator who shows up and participates.
Generally, I hear what you're saying and don't disagree, but this is one of those truisms that applies across the whole spectrum of Internet governance: constrained-resource allocation, protocol definition, route and capacity forecasting, carrier interconnect, what-have-you. It's the people who sit back and say that someone else is doing it who don't get represented and don't get their way. So while I absolutely recognize the phenomenon you're describing and wish it were otherwise, the solution is action, not complaint.
-Bill
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAk1NlDkACgkQGvQy4xTRsBF6KACfe+xqvrt8ikLIJme99rLYT1OZ
tQYAoJ+VsUMsui5W6ss++aOXOPEqqoRh
=Cruc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NANOG
mailing list