Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
jbates at brightok.net
Fri Feb 4 10:55:21 CST 2011
On 2/4/2011 10:50 AM, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> I suspect that many people will do stupid things in managing their
> bits - presuming that there is virtually infinate 'greenfield' and
> when they have "pissed in the pool" they can just move on to a new
> pool. the downside... renumbering is never easy - even with/especially
> with IPv6.
The problem is, they'll be restricted by RIR guidelines. I know that
existing and future IPv6 allocation proposals for ARIN (our immediate
concern) is based more on end site counts, and a limitation of /48 per
end site without very good justification.
More information about the NANOG