quietly....

Thu Feb 3 22:27:48 UTC 2011

On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:01:52 EST, Jay Ashworth said:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Valdis Kletnieks" <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu>
> 
> > On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:41:12 EST, Matthew Huff said:
> > > SMTP is definitely not a p2p protocol in most corporate
> > > environments.
> > 
> > Ahem. Please quit confusing "the protocol" with "that small segment of
> > the protocol we choose to allow/support on our network".
> 
> Ahem.
> 
> Please quit confusing "The Internet" with "my small edge network, which I
> interconnect with The Internet".

Corporations use a different version of RFC5321 that's 30% shorter and
removes features they happen to not use?  Or are they using the same
RFC5321, but simply not using all the features?

The distinction is in fact important.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20110203/1dc0224e/attachment.sig>