simon.perreault at viagenie.ca
Thu Feb 3 14:46:06 CST 2011
On 2011-02-03 15:29, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Thursday, February 03, 2011 02:55:39 pm Jack Bates wrote:
>> Do you think we have to have a standard for them to implement it?
>> If they can ignore the CPE router rules, they can implement NAT66 on
>> their own, too.
> See the map66 Sourceforge.net project. Already happening.
OpenBSD's pf has had stateful NAT66 for many years...
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
More information about the NANOG