quietly....
John Curran
jcurran at arin.net
Wed Feb 2 12:37:54 UTC 2011
On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:19 PM, John Curran wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:05 PM, George Herbert wrote:
>>
>> More interesting would be re-requests - organizations exhausting an
>> initial allocation and requiring more. People asking for the first
>> one just indicates initial adoption rates.
>>
>> Other than experimental blocks, I am generally under the impression
>> that IPv6 allocations are designed to avoid that being necessary for
>> an extended period of time. If that is not true, then that's a flag.
>
> I don't believe we've had an IPv6 "additional" request yet (but I look
> forward to it happening at some point :-). I will check and get back
> to the list with the definitive answer.
It turns out we've had a handful of ISPs come back for additional IPv6
blocks but it was the result of an better understanding of their evolving
address allocation requirements pre-deployment.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
More information about the NANOG
mailing list