Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
cra at WPI.EDU
Tue Feb 1 17:38:46 CST 2011
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:14:57PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> > There are many cases where ULA is a perfect fit, and to work
> > around it seems silly and reduces the full capabilities of IPv6. I
> > fully expect to see protocols and networks within homes which will
> > take full advantage of ULA. I also expect to see hosts which don't
> > talk to the public internet directly and never need a GUA.
> I guess we can agree to disagree about this. I haven't seen one yet.
What would your recommended solution be then for disconnected
networks? Every home user and enterprise user requests GUA directly
from their RIR/NIR/LIR at a cost of hunderds of dollars per year or
More information about the NANOG