subnet prefix length > 64 breaks IPv6?

Mark Tinka mtinka at globaltransit.net
Thu Dec 29 05:39:27 CST 2011


On Thursday, December 29, 2011 05:10:15 PM Saku Ytti wrote:

> Of course this isn't strictly true,...

Of course, not "strictly". 

What I meant was the CRS and ASR9000 don't operate like the 
6500/7600 and other Cisco switches that punted packets to 
CPU if, for one reason or another, a bug or misconfiguration 
caused said packets to be sent to the CPU for forwarding.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20111229/4d7f6031/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list