IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Wed Dec 28 06:55:57 CST 2011
Ray Soucy wrote:
> Your straw man argument (which is what this has become) is just
> dancing around the real issue.� You're going to have to back up and
> make your case for us, rather than trying to respond to one-liners
> made (most of which were sarcastic, by the way).
No counter argument possible against such abstract nonsense.
> You have yet to identify who (beyond yourself) is calling for RA to be
Tomas Podermanski wrote:
: from my perspective the short answer for this never-ending story is:
: - SLAAC/RA is totally useless, does not bring any benefit at all
: and should be removed from IPv6 specs
: I personally prefer to bury SLAAC once forever for several reasons:
> though you made it sound like majority of the IETF was.
No, I didn't.
More information about the NANOG