IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Mon Dec 26 17:56:38 UTC 2011

On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:32:46 EST, Ray Soucy said:
> 2011/12/26 Masataka Ohta <mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>:
> > And, if RA is obsoleted, which is a point of discussion, there
> > is no reason to keep so bloated ND only for address resolution.

> By who?  Sources please.
> A few people on NANOG complaining about RA is pretty far from deprecation of RA.

Especially when some of the biggest IPv6 networks out there are still using
it pretty heavily.

(C''mon you guys, *deploy* already.  It's pretty sad when people are arguing
about stuff like this, and a frikkin' cow college out in the boonies pushing
300-400mbits/sec of IPv6 off-campus is still a "large" deployment. It's
embarassing for the industry as a whole)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20111226/24dcaf11/attachment.sig>

More information about the NANOG mailing list