IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
bonomi at mail.r-bonomi.com
Thu Dec 22 01:51:52 CST 2011
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> OK, I'll name names. If you have end users still running WinXP, getting
> them at least somewhat working under SLAAC/DHCPv4 is a lot less headache
> than trying to DHCPv6 them.
> Anybody managed to stamp out WinXP in their end user population yet?
Heh. I haven't manage to stamp out WinXP in _my_ usage.
Microsoft's "Services for Unix" doesn't run on on anything but the obsecenely
high-priced top-end versions of their newer releases. In addition to the
significantly increased hardware requirements to get the same "user app"
performance, this makes upgrading a 'show stopper'.
More information about the NANOG