local_preference for transit traffic?

Keegan Holley keegan.holley at sungard.com
Thu Dec 15 00:33:47 CST 2011


I suppose so because prepend is so easily defeated, but sometimes you don't
own a prefix shorter than the one you need to advertise.  Assuming I
understand your suggestion correctly.

2011/12/15 Holmes,David A <dholmes at mwdh2o.com>

> For this very reason I have advocated using longest prefix BGP routing for
> some years now, and checking periodically for the expected path, as it
> became obvious from investigating traceroutes that traffic was not being
> routed as intended using AS prepends.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keegan Holley [mailto:keegan.holley at sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 10:08 PM
> To: NANOG
> Subject: local_preference for transit traffic?
>
> Had in interesting conversation with a transit AS on behalf of a customer
> where I found out they are using communities to raise the local preference
> of routes that do not originate locally by default before sending to a
> other larger transit AS's.  Obviously this isn't something that was asked
> of them and it took a few days to find since the customer is not a large
> company and neither them nor my company has a link or business relationship
> with the AS in question.  This seemed strange to me for obvious reasons,
> but I was curious if anyone else was doing this and why.  You obviously
> cannot use prepend to affect transit traffic again for obvious reasons.
> MED is a weak metric but it at least only affects traffic that was already
> going to transit your AS.  The larger transit AS was favoring a lower
> bandwidth link for the customer and causing them to drop packets
> mysteriously.  Just wondering if this practice seemed as strange to others
> as it does to me.
>
> This communication, together with any attachments or embedded links, is
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information
> that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying,
> dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete the original and
> all copies of the communication, along with any attachments or embedded
> links, from your system.
>
>


More information about the NANOG mailing list