EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship

Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.lists at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 06:31:06 CST 2011


Wonderful.  I would urge SPs based stateside to strongly consider
endorsing the MAAWG comments.

thanks
suresh

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:06 PM, O'Reirdan, Michael
<Michael_OReirdan at cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> MAAWG has written voicing its concerns on SOPA and PIPA.
>
> http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_US_Congress_S968-HR3261_Comments_2011-12.pdf
>
> Mike
> ________________________________________
> From: Suresh Ramasubramanian [ops.lists at gmail.com]
> Sent: 14 December 2011 05:12
> To: Hal Murray
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship
>
> I would strongly suggest that operators work with their legal
> departments to endorse this paper by Crocker and others.
>
> If other ISP organizations (such as say MAAWG) come out with
> something, other operators could sign on to that as well.
>
> The EFF petition has way too much propaganda and far less content than
> would be entirely productive in a policy discussion.
>
> --srs
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:
>>
>>  Security and Other Technical Concerns Raised by the
>>    DNS Filtering Requirements in the PROTECT IP Bill
>>  Authors:
>>    Steve Crocker, Shinkuro, Inc.
>>    David Dagon, Georgia Tech
>>    Dan Kaminsky, DKH
>>    Danny McPherson, Verisign, Inc.
>>    Paul Vixie, Internet Systems Consortium
>
>
>
> --
> Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)
>



-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at gmail.com)



More information about the NANOG mailing list