Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering

Mark Tinka mtinka at globaltransit.net
Fri Dec 9 08:45:03 CST 2011


On Friday, December 09, 2011 08:57:39 PM Jen Linkova wrote:

> on second thought - why are they using link-local as the
> next-hop in the first place if the eBGP session is
> established over GUA?

This topic was heavily discussed on 'ipv6-ops' back in 
February. You may take a look here for all the details on 
this:

http://lists.cluenet.de/pipermail/ipv6-ops/2011-
February/004887.html

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20111209/2413c002/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list