Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering

Mark Tinka mtinka at
Fri Dec 9 14:45:03 UTC 2011

On Friday, December 09, 2011 08:57:39 PM Jen Linkova wrote:

> on second thought - why are they using link-local as the
> next-hop in the first place if the eBGP session is
> established over GUA?

This topic was heavily discussed on 'ipv6-ops' back in 
February. You may take a look here for all the details on 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <>

More information about the NANOG mailing list