bgp update destroying transit on redback routers ?
rjs at rob.sh
Fri Dec 2 01:55:29 CST 2011
On 1 Dec 2011, at 23:04, Warren Kumari wrote:
> tp://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-idr-as0-01 has been replaced with http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-as0-00 -- which does include it.
Whilst we are on the subject of relevant drafts - it should be noted that situations like this provide significant motivation for the work presented in both  and  (full disclosure: I am the editor of ). I'd really encourage the community to review both documents and comment on whether they provide benefit in this problem space. I'm very happy to take feedback on the requirements draft  particularly - since this aimed to describe this problem from an operator perspective.
Essentially, until something is done in a more general sense in the protocol, we will continue to see threads liked this one popping up every few months.
I'll post a further update to the nanog list when we have requested a working group last-call on the requirements draft asking for reviews.
Thanks for your time,
More information about the NANOG