Link local for P-t-P links? (Was: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?)

Tom Lanyon tom+nanog at oneshoeco.com
Thu Dec 1 18:26:43 CST 2011


Hi,

On 01/12/2011, at 12:45 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
> Link-Local?
> [snip]
> Am I a complete idiot missing some obvious major issues with link
> locals, or am i just the only one not thinking IPv4-think? Opinions?
> :)


In a DC / hosting provider context, we're doing this.

We started out assigning all of our PtP links (where we had /31s in the IPv4 world) IPv6 /64s and addressing using ::1 and ::2 with /127 masks from these /64s (to address potential ND table overflow concerns), but have now settled on using automatic link-local addresses instead.

Our IGP propagates the routers' /128 loopbacks and these are used for routing user traffic.

Having the IGP table only contain the /128 loopbacks, and none of the PtP networks is nice. :)


On 01/12/2011, at 12:52 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> I for one get really irritated when my traceroutes and pings are
> broken and I need to troubleshoot things. ;-)  But I guess something
> has to give.

You don't have to give up working traceroute / ping to use link-local on your PtPs.  

Our traffic routes through globally reachable router loopbacks which looks pretty in traceroutes, are pingable and doesn't break PMTUD.

Tom




More information about the NANOG mailing list