IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?

Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Thu Dec 1 03:10:19 UTC 2011

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:19:51 EST, Ray Soucy said:

> There is a lot of talk about "buggy" systems that are unable to handle
> prefixes longer than 64; but I've yet to encounter one.  I imagine if
> I did it would be treated as a bug and fixed. 

What year did Cisco first release IOS?
What year did Cisco finally stamp the last vestiges of class A/B/C out of IOS?

That's how many years it will take to get rid of the last buggy IPv6 that won't
do a 64+ prefix.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20111130/84305eff/attachment.sig>

More information about the NANOG mailing list