IPv6 Real World Maturity (was re: How long is your rack?)
Tim Wilde
twilde at cymru.com
Mon Aug 15 00:43:44 UTC 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 8/14/2011 8:36 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
> Can someone explain the operational relevance of the never ending v6
> threads that are the EXACT SAME ARGUMENTS over and over and over
> again? :)
Yes, they prove that IPv6 is not a viable technology as it currently
stands and we should be working on the next big thing, of course!
IPv42, here I come!
On a serious note, though, really, what DOES it say about the real-world
maturity / actual chances of adoption for IPv6 that Charles' statement
above is, in fact, true? Not trying to be anti-IPv6 or start a flamewar
(well, okay, I am trying to start a flamewar, that's what Sunday nights
are for :)), it's honestly something that puzzles me. It just doesn't
feel right...
Regards,
Tim
- --
Tim Wilde, Senior Software Engineer, Team Cymru, Inc.
twilde at cymru.com | +1-630-230-5433 | http://www.team-cymru.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEARECAAYFAk5Ia8AACgkQluRbRini9thKyACfZ6H6m0GQRLm6SWCOGZ663j/G
5+kAn0JM74VwRkCeaBhaTRYEY3Hz7oK1
=h5jP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the NANOG
mailing list