OSPF vs IS-IS

Joel Jaeggli joelja at bogus.com
Fri Aug 12 01:39:04 UTC 2011


On Aug 11, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

>> The only reason in my opinion to run IS-IS rather than OSPF today is
>> due to the fact that IS-IS is decoupled from IP making it less
>> vulnerable to attacks.
> 
> how about simpler and more stable?

not rooted to a particular area.

supports more than one AFI at the same time

isn't dependent on ip addressing to form an adjacency

etc

> randy
> 





More information about the NANOG mailing list