Verizon Issues? East Coast US

James Smallacombe up at 3.am
Wed Aug 3 19:27:27 UTC 2011


I'm having issues through Verizon too...I have a server colocated in 
Vancouver...could it be a Canadian thing with Verizon?

  2  l100.phlapa-vfttp-60.verizon-gni.net (98.114.95.1)  8.910 ms  8.760 ms 
7.026 ms
  3  g3-0-2-860.phlapa-lcr-08.verizon-gni.net (130.81.139.120)  10.711 ms 
8.466 ms  10.698 ms
  4  * * *
  5  so-13-2-0-0.res-bb-rtr2.verizon-gni.net (130.81.19.118)  14.937 ms 
15.975 ms  15.148 ms
  6  0.ae2.br2.iad8.alter.net (152.63.34.73)  14.346 ms  13.943 ms  14.833 
ms
  7  * * *
  8  * * *

I can ssh to the box from other networks, and here's a traceroute back to 
my Verzon FIOS IP...other Verizon customers (DSL, etc) report same 
problem:

  2  static-209-17-142-114.gtcust.grouptelecom.net (209.17.142.114)  0.744 
ms  0.642 ms  0.620 ms
  3  static-66-38-255-9.gtcust.grouptelecom.net (66.38.255.9)  0.750 ms 
0.657 ms  0.649 ms
  4  GE3-0.PEERA-VANCBC.IP.GROUPTELECOM.NET (66.59.190.6)  0.730 ms  0.694 
ms  0.693 ms
  5  bx4-vancouver_G1-1-6.net.bell.ca (67.69.199.105)  0.847 ms  0.836 ms 
0.828 ms
  6  core4-vancouver_ge8-0-0.net.bell.ca (64.230.183.109)  4.637 ms
     core3-vancouver_ge8-0-0.net.bell.ca (64.230.183.105)  113.794 ms 
17.328 ms
  7  core2-seattle_pos4-0-0_core.net.bell.ca (64.230.144.97)  23.686 ms
     core1-seattle_pos6-0-0_core.net.bell.ca (64.230.144.89)  4.672 ms
     core2-seattle_pos4-0-0_core.net.bell.ca (64.230.144.97)  5.720 ms
  8  bx2-seattle_POS10-0-0.net.bell.ca (64.230.186.22)  4.358 ms
     bx2-seattle_POS11-0-0.net.bell.ca (64.230.186.26)  4.396 ms
     bx2-seattle_POS10-0-0.net.bell.ca (64.230.186.22)  4.353 ms
  9  Comcast-peering.net.bell.ca (67.69.246.198)  4.991 ms  4.795 ms  4.795 
ms
10  pos-0-4-0-0-cr01.seattle.wa.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.86.137)  8.285 ms 
5.258 ms  4.919 ms
11  pos-0-6-0-0-cr01.denver.co.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.87.49)  46.892 ms 
46.901 ms  46.952 ms
12  pos-0-13-0-0-cr01.chicago.il.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.85.245)  57.243 
ms  57.359 ms  57.333 ms
13  pos-2-13-0-0-cr01.newyork.ny.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.87.25)  85.080 
ms  85.020 ms  85.069 ms
14  te-2-1-pe01.philadelphia.pa.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.84.194)  87.264 
ms  86.372 ms  86.453 ms
15  75.149.230.250 (75.149.230.250)  86.548 ms  86.489 ms  86.439 ms


On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Mike Tancsa wrote:

> I was just looking at an issue between 701 in Toronto.   Seems to be resolved now-- at least the issue I was seeing.
>
>
> the bad traceroute, looked like
> ....
> 3  if-3-0-2.core3.TNK-Toronto.as6453.net (64.86.81.3)  0.988 ms  0.978 ms  1.578 ms
> 4  209.58.94.10 (209.58.94.10)  1.902 ms  71.416 ms  3.472 ms
> 5  if-3-1-0-0.tcore1.NJY-Newark.as6453.net (216.6.98.34)  22.286 ms  21.957 ms  29.472 ms
> 6  if-12-0.mcore3.NJY-Newark.as6453.net (66.198.70.14)  67.961 ms
>    if-3-0-0.mcore3.NJY-Newark.as6453.net (216.6.57.121)  21.449 ms  20.956 ms
> 7  if-10-0.core3.NTO-NewYork.as6453.net (216.6.57.66)  21.975 ms  22.467 ms  21.977 ms
> 8  Vlan1297.icore1.NTO-NewYork.as6453.net (209.58.26.49)  20.977 ms *  30.520 ms
> 9  0.ae20.BR2.NYC4.ALTER.NET (204.255.168.173)  21.478 ms  21.458 ms  21.477 ms
> 10  *
> 11  *
>
> Now its working
>
> ....
> 3  if-3-0-2.core3.TNK-Toronto.as6453.net (64.86.81.3)  0.975 ms
> 4  209.58.94.10 (209.58.94.10)  1.975 ms
> 5  if-3-1-0-0.tcore1.NJY-Newark.as6453.net (216.6.98.34)  21.445 ms
> 6  if-12-0.mcore3.NJY-Newark.as6453.net (66.198.70.14)  54.472 ms
> 7  if-10-0.core3.NTO-NewYork.as6453.net (216.6.57.66)  112.426 ms
> 8  Vlan1297.icore1.NTO-NewYork.as6453.net (209.58.26.49)  22.964 ms
> 9  0.ae20.BR2.NYC4.ALTER.NET (204.255.168.173)  21.455 ms
> 10  0.ae2.XL4.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.3.117)  21.466 ms
> 11  0.so-5-1-0.XT2.TOR2.ALTER.NET (152.63.128.121)  34.958 ms
> 12  0.POS7-1.GW2.TOR2.ALTER.NET (152.63.131.205)  33.958 ms
>
>
> When it was not working, packets would not get from my AS (11647) to the target in IP in AS701.  But packets from 701 would get back to my AS.  The AS path in both directions are 701-6453-11647 and 11647 6453 701...  I saw a similar outage to VPNs I have in AS15290 which I see as 11647 6453 701 15290.  However, I did not have time to check if it was the same behaviour with loss being in one direction. In both cases, IPs that follow 11647 174 701 and 701 174 11647 and 11647 174 7018 15290  and 15290 7018 174 11647 were not impacted.
>
> 	---Mike
>
>
>
> On 2/28/2011 9:53 PM, ML wrote:
>> Seeing some packet loss via Cogent.
>>
>> www.internetpulse.net seems to be lighting up.
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> -------------------
> Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
> Sentex Communications, mike at sentex.net
> Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
> Cambridge, Ontario Canada   http://www.tancsa.com/
>
>

James Smallacombe		      PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
up at 3.am							    http://3.am
=========================================================================




More information about the NANOG mailing list