tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Wed Apr 27 12:20:19 UTC 2011
On 27 Apr 2011, at 08:19, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Andrew Kirch wrote:
>> I'm not complaining, but I would point out that if these free brokers are the public face of IPv6 for many hobbyists (and much of the various software run on/over the internet is written by volunteers, and/or given away for free), we aren't going to get there. The big deafening silence from SIXXS is really unfortunate in that it does actively affect my opinion of IPv6, my willingness to spend time implementing it, pestering my upstream about it, or having my business give a damn about it. Yes I know they're volunteers, but how much does that matter?
> So you would prefer that they shut down their service rather than provide current level of support?
I've had very prompt and good replies from SixXS when I've contacted them.
Equally students I know who use HE brokers are very happy with their service, e.g. HE have added features in response to feedback.
More information about the NANOG