swmike at swm.pp.se
Tue Apr 26 00:28:34 CDT 2011
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, Andrew Kirch wrote:
> But if these two groups want people to take IPv6 seriously (you know,
> before the ceiling comes down on our heads), maybe they should take it
Having run a volunteer service before, I can tell you there are a lot of
people complaining about the free service. I would imagine the only
alternative to doing what they do now is to either get more money and
resources (sponsorship or paying customers) or to shut the service down.
What is a preferrable service, a "not great" service, or no service at
all? I know I wouldn't have the energy to handle all the abuse I see them
getting, I would just tell people to go away and go home and watch tv. I'm
happy they have the energy to do what they're doing.
That's why I asked for SLA level services I can point people to who
complain. I'd imagine most of them wouldn't want to pay anyway, but I hope
it'll make them think about complaining too much about a free service.
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
More information about the NANOG