gmail dropping mesages
jmitchell at ll.mit.edu
Mon Apr 25 17:12:08 UTC 2011
On 04/22/2011 07:24 PM, Lynda wrote:
>>> Non existent, it's SPF only.
>> My point.
> Nearly all of the spam I see is DKIM signed. It just makes messages
> bigger. I'd just as soon our volunteers spend their times on other
> things, myself.
DKIM isn't designed explicitly to stop spam, it's designed to identify
If you trust the issued certificates(!) being used to sign the mail, you
at least have a good indication that the spam is coming from the domain
that it says it's coming from. This can make spam blocking much more
effective because instead of simply hoping that a domain-based blocklist
will block spam and not ham (due to spoofed sender addresses), you have
a pretty good feeling that this will be the case.
Of course this relies on various other bits and pieces to fall into
place, such as properly handling such messages (Gmail's detection and
handling rules aren't public AFAIK), CAs not being compromised, etc. Not
to mention that the spammers can simply register another domain and buy
a new cert -- but then the argument above still holds.
More information about the NANOG