Top-posting (was: Barracuda Networks is at it again: Any Suggestions as to anAlternative? )
jcdill.lists at gmail.com
Tue Apr 12 10:22:34 CDT 2011
On 12/04/11 6:47 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Tim Chown<tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>> But I'm afraid times have changed; bottom-posted email is now an annoyance
>> to most just as a slow-loading web page would be.
> Then you're doing it wrong. You're supposed to trim the original down
> to just the context that clarifies your response. That's the other
> problem with top-posters... nobody trims, so if I want to understand
> what they're attempting to say I have to scroll down, read all the
> previous messages and then guess which part they're replying to.
> Usually the lazy top-poster hasn't said anything worth that much effort.
An even bigger problem is that the lazy top-poster often misses critical
issues that either clarify the post they are replying to (making their
reply irrelevant) or forgets to reply to something critical in the
quoted text. I run into this often at $dayjob, where I can't ask more
than one question in an email because the top-posted reply generally
only addresses the first question.
The people who top post see this as a feature - they get their reply
composed and sent off faster and can then move on to other things. They
don't understand why they fail to thrive in their jobs as co-workers
start to route discussions around them and then ultimately they are the
first to be laid off because they aren't seen as an essential part of
More information about the NANOG