Yahoo! Mail Issue
Joshua William Klubi
joshua.klubi at gmail.com
Tue Apr 12 06:41:45 UTC 2011
Well yahoo's mx tend to do that a lot. i used to have a lot of bounced
emails to yahoo until i implemented dkim, domainkeys and spf then all my
yahoo problems disappeared ,
I just want to know if you have implemented any of
these technologies dkim,domainkeys and spf, other wise you would have all
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Nathanael C. Cariaga
> <nccariaga at stluke.com.ph> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > It seems that we're having some problems receiving emails from selected
> > Yahoo! Mail Accounts. I noticed that there is a commonality between the
> > accounts that fails when sending an email to our domain (see email header
> > below)
> > From: "MAILER-DAEMON at nm1.bullet.mail.sg1.yahoo.com"
> > <MAILER-DAEMON at nm1.bullet.mail.sg1.yahoo.com>
> > To: *-*-*-*-*a at yahoo.com
> > Sent: Fri, April 8, 2011 6:26:08 PM
> > Subject: Failure Notice
> > Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address.
> > <xxxxxxxxxa at stluke.com.ph>:
> > Mail server for "stluke.com.ph" unreachable for too long
> Um...it might be easier to get mail, if your host didn't close
> the connection with a 5xx error. :/
> mpetach at hinotori:~> host -t mx stluke.com.ph
> stluke.com.ph mail is handled by 20 qc.stluke.com.ph.
> stluke.com.ph mail is handled by 20 mx1.stluke.com.ph.
> stluke.com.ph mail is handled by 40 gc.stluke.com.ph.
> mpetach at hinotori:~> nslookup qc.stluke.com.ph.
> Server: 127.0.0.1
> Address: 127.0.0.1#53
> Non-authoritative answer:
> Name: qc.stluke.com.ph
> Address: 220.127.116.11
> mpetach at hinotori:~>
> mpetach at opstools1:~> telnet 18.104.22.168 25
> Trying 22.214.171.124...
> Connected to static-host-219-90-94-56.tri.ph.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> ehlo yahoo.com
> 554 SMTP synchronization error
> Connection closed by foreign host.
> mpetach at opstools1:~>
> I imagine when port 25 stops giving 5xx
> failure message back, mail reception
> might improve. ^_^;
More information about the NANOG