v6 Avian Carriers?
jra at baylink.com
Thu Apr 7 22:56:47 UTC 2011
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Valdis Kletnieks" <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu>
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:
> > Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
> > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
> > That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is
> > funny
> > that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the
> > contrary.
> Yes, but I bet many providers recognize rfc1149 now. rfc6214 gives us
> a new brown M&M to put into the contracts...
I wonder what NYC paramedic David Roth would think, to find out that
he'd coined a bit of technical jargon, quite by accident.
More information about the NANOG