v6 Avian Carriers?
scott.brim at gmail.com
Thu Apr 7 19:39:03 UTC 2011
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:35, <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:
> > Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
> > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
> > That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is funny
> > that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the
> Yes, but I bet many providers recognize rfc1149 now. rfc6214 gives us a
> brown M&M to put into the contracts...
You need to specify "tail drop" behavior.
More information about the NANOG