v6 Avian Carriers?

Michael K. Smith - Adhost mksmith at adhost.com
Fri Apr 1 20:26:59 CDT 2011


I thought iced-over fiber was a little bit like muffler-bearings.  Great
excuse if they buy it.

Mike

On 4/1/11 6:07 PM, "Owen DeLong" <owen at delong.com> wrote:

>It's also especially sensitive to icing induced packet loss.
>
>Owen
>
>On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:30 AM, GP Wooden wrote:
>
>> I wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...
>> 
>> ----- Reply message -----
>> From: "Scott Morris" <swm at emanon.com>
>> Date: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 9:01 am
>> Subject: v6 Avian Carriers?
>> To: <nanog at nanog.org>
>> 
>> Mmm...  Good question.  Would it actually come back OUT in a
>> recognizable (de-encapsulated) manner?
>> 
>> I'll vote with packet loss, 'cause tunneling seems pretty gross.   ;)
>> 
>> Scott
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/1/11 2:41 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
>>> I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on.   Now I know.
>>>So if a v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet
>>>loss or tunneling?
>>> 
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marc
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>





More information about the NANOG mailing list