v6 Avian Carriers?
dorn at hetzel.org
Fri Apr 1 12:28:55 CDT 2011
I'm thinking both TCP and UDP, and for ICMP don't NAT's use the sequence
number field to keep them separate ?
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Justin M. Streiner
<streiner at cluebyfour.org>wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
> I was thinking today would be a good day to write an RFC for "fractional
>> DHCP" where end-users can get issued say 1/64 of an v4 IP, say
>> 22.214.171.124:1024-2047. Other users on the same DSLAM, etc behind the
>> carrier NAT would have other shares of the same public IP. :)
> Would the end-user get both the TCP and UDP ports from their assigned
> range? Also, how would you handle ICMP/ESP/etc... or would those be 'free
> with the purchase of..."?
More information about the NANOG