RIP Justification

• Previous message (by thread): RIP Justification
• Next message (by thread): the lazy mans HW research
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Haha It's all good :)
You are right about IS-IS being less resource intensive than OSPF, and
that it scales better!



On 30 September 2010 23:50, Jack Carrozzo <jack at crepinc.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Both OSPF and IS-IS use Dijkstra. IS-IS isn't as widely used because
>> of the ISO addressing. Atleast thats my take on it..
>
> Sorry, my mistake. I'll go sit in my corner now...
> -Jack

• Previous message (by thread): RIP Justification
• Next message (by thread): the lazy mans HW research
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]