Jonathon.Exley at kordia.co.nz
Wed Sep 29 16:50:54 CDT 2010
RIP is useful as an edge protocol where there is a single access - less system overhead than OSPF.
The service provider and the customer can redistribute the routes into whatever routing protocol they use in their own networks.
From: Jesse Loggins [mailto:jlogginsccie at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 30 September 2010 9:21 a.m.
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: RIP Justification
A group of engineers and I were having a design discussion about routing protocols including RIP and static routing and the justifications of use for each protocol. One very interesting discussion was surrounding RIP and its use versus a protocol like OSPF. It seems that many Network Engineers consider RIP an old antiquated protocol that should be thrown in back of a closet "never to be seen or heard from again". Some even preferred using a more complex protocol like OSPF instead of RIP. I am of the opinion that every protocol has its place, which seems to be contrary to some engineers way of thinking. This leads to my question. What are your views of when and where the RIP protocol is useful? Please excuse me if this is the incorrect forum for such questions.
CCIE#14661 (R&S, Service Provider)
This email and attachments: are confidential; may be protected by
privilege and copyright; if received in error may not be used,copied,
or kept; are not guaranteed to be virus-free; may not express the
views of Kordia(R); do not designate an information system; and do not
give rise to any liability for Kordia(R).
More information about the NANOG