Randy in Nevis
lyndon at orthanc.ca
Mon Sep 27 16:30:06 UTC 2010
On 10-09-27 7:20 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> "Cannot establish SSL with SMTP server 220.127.116.11:465" does not
> sound like a 587 problem to me.
> netalyzr folks? comment?
Sorry, I hit send too soon ...
I've heard from a couple of people that the PIX will remap 587 (and 25)
to oddball ports if you fiddle the config just right. Given all the
other bogosity that box does with SMTP I wonder if there's truth to the
rumour. (I haven't found anyone who can reproduce this on demand, so
it's still apocryphal for now.)
More information about the NANOG