Matlock, Kenneth L MatlockK at
Fri Sep 24 21:41:59 UTC 2010

Which is fine and all (being that it's on-topic). My main beef is that a
certain person can't take a hint. Using an 'anonymous' re-mailer to try
and get people to read nothing more than copy/paste, and then 5 billion
'references' (most of which use asinine '' references
instead of the actual document) strikes me as unprofessional at the
least, if not infantile.

I'd have thought he'd have learned the last 50 times he got smacked down
for this. But of course, I'm just an ignorant American! :)

Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
Exempla Healthcare
(303) 467-4671
matlockk at

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:jeroen at] 
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 3:31 PM
To: Matlock, Kenneth L
Cc: nanog at
Subject: Re: OpenFlow

On 2010-09-24 23:25, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
> Wow, resorting to using a spoofed email address to propagate your
> and forget to remove your .sig
> Some people just don't take a hint, do they? I know which software
> package I WON'T be recommending to anyone (in fact, quite the

And also, there is a nice agenda item at NANOG50;

Track: Open Flow
Nick McKeown, Stanford University; Matt Davy, Indiana University
Presentation Date: October 4, 2010, 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM

OpenFlow: An Update
OpenFlow Trials and Deployments

Thus as it is a NANOG-ish topic, I wonder why somebody needs to hide.


More information about the NANOG mailing list