XO Routing

Patrick W. Gilmore patrick at ianai.net
Thu Sep 16 11:54:59 CDT 2010


On Sep 16, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Stefan Molnar wrote:

> My sales director said it was their peering.

First problem with a statement talking about technical problems: "My sales director said...."

Second problem: "Peering" does not cause internal routing loops.  Er, should not.

Third problem: "Was".

-- 
TTFN,
patrick


> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> 
>> The unconfirmed chatter I'm hearing is that they were leaking peering routes to other peers. Can anyone check and confirm this? Renesys?
>> 
>> -C
>> 
>> On Sep 16, 2010, at 9:09 12AM, William Byrd wrote:
>> 
>>> XO Engineers are telling us that they are aware of packet loss across their
>>> network and are looking into it. We're experiencing slow/degraded
>>> connectivity out of St. Louis and Nashville but Atlanta and Dallas are
>>> problem free.
>>> 
>>> William Collier-Byrd
>>> will at collier-byrd.net
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick at ianai.net>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> This should probably be on [email protected], but XO is definitely having problems
>>>> to places like speedtest.com & RCN from Boston.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> TTFN,
>>>> patrick
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> The internet health report is showing high latency to most of their
>>>> peers.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Chuck.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 16, 2010 11:57 AM, "Stefan Molnar" <stefan at csudsu.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is happening right
>>>>>> now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Stefan
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 





More information about the NANOG mailing list