Convenience or slippery slope... or something else?
morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Sat Sep 11 10:43:26 CDT 2010
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Christopher Morrow
<morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Reese <reese at inkworkswell.com> wrote:
>> A friend brought this to my attention:
> as an aside:
> note the cert in used for the NIC's website... surely the .CO ccTLD
> could use a real cert?
also it's not clear that the ipq.co service is really all that robust
(if that'd matter to anyone) since ipq.co's nameservers:
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;ipq.co. IN NS
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
ipq.co. 900 IN NS A.NS.ipq.co.
ipq.co. 900 IN NS B.NS.ipq.co.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
A.NS.ipq.co. 900 IN A 126.96.36.199
B.NS.ipq.co. 900 IN A 188.8.131.52
are the same host/ip.
More information about the NANOG