largest OSPF core
r.hyunseog at ieee.org
Thu Sep 2 13:42:34 CDT 2010
I think it is really depending on how your network topology looks like.
If you have top-down design with star topology to limit the network
connections to individual routers, it may scale well.
But if you connect every routers to each other such as full-mesh, it
will be a problem during interface flapping or something like that.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell at ufp.org> wrote:
> In a message written on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0300, lorddoskias wrote:
>> I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number
>> of routers) out there?
> I'll admit to having seen a network with over 400 devices in an
> OSPF area 0, didn't design it, and in the end didn't get to work
> on it.
> Far as I know worked just fine though, no issues reported. How
> well your IGP scales depends a lot more on what you put in it, and
> how dynamic your network situation is than the protocol or number
> of devices.
> Leo Bicknell - bicknell at ufp.org - CCIE 3440
> PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
More information about the NANOG