IPv4 sunset date revised : 2009-02-05
Barry Shein
bzs at world.std.com
Sat Oct 23 16:21:16 UTC 2010
The idea was to observe and measure an (almost) all IPv4 network and
its management/infrastructure costs, namely the one we got, not an
IPv6 one, before the transition starts to muddy the waters
significantly.
-b
On October 22, 2010 at 18:03 bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com (bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:28:24PM -0400, Barry Shein wrote:
> >
> > It occurs to me that there is some pressing need to investigate this
> > all-IPv6 internet -- motivated by the cost of (not) maintaining IPv4
> > forever.
> >
> > Right now we can observe essentially an all-IPv4 internet (99%,
> > whatever.)
> >
> > --
> > -Barry Shein
>
>
> For this, you need to leave the comfort of NANOG and look
> at the CERNnet network over the past ten years. They have
> been running a large, all IPv6 network for some time now.
>
>
> http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/Cannes-19148-IPv6-development-China-Outline-Efforts-CERNET-History-Testbed-1-2-3-4-5-Next-Generation-Inter-in-as-Entertainment-ppt-powerpoint/
>
> www.cs.princeton.edu/~yiwang/papers/iscc05.pdf
>
> http://www.cernet2.edu.cn/en/char.htm
>
>
> --bill
--
-Barry Shein
The World | bzs at TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada
Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*
More information about the NANOG
mailing list