IPv6

Cameron Byrne cb.list6 at gmail.com
Sun Nov 21 15:31:46 CST 2010


On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Mike Tancsa <mike at sentex.net> wrote:
>> On 11/18/2010 5:14 PM, Lee Riemer wrote:
>>> Try tracerouting to 2001:500:4:13::81 (www.arin.net) or
>>> 2001:470:0:76::2 (www.he.net) via Cogent.
>>>
>>
>> Interesting. I noticed a similar issue with  ipv6.cnn.com today. I dont
>> see it via TATA, but see it via Cogent.  So whats the story behind it
>> and ARIN not being seen through cogent ?  Is it due to no v6 relation
>> bewtween he.net and Cogent ?
>>
>> 2620:0:2200:8:8888:8888:8888:8901  (whats with the crazy 8s?)
>>
>
> Wow.  CNN now has IPv6.  That's awesome.  I guess i missed the memo.
>
> So, major players with IPv6 are?
>
> ipv6.cnn.com (just book marked it)
>
> ipv6.comcast.net
>
> ipv6.google.com (or you can have it all with a white-list)
>
> www.ipv6.cisco.com
>
> www.v6.facebook.com
> m.v6.facebook.com
>
> ipv6.t-mobile.com (admittedly, not major a major content source, but it's mine)
>
>

Yahoo just dropped in on the IPv6 content party

http://ipv6.weather.yahoo.com/

I just bookmarked it.  Well done Yahoos.

Cameron
 =======
 http://groups.google.com/group/tmoipv6beta
 =======


> And, then debunking the "dual-stack is too risky" notion is
> www.ucla.edu (which is a big business by most measures) and serves
> AAAA and A records without a white-list or special FQDN.
>
> I have predicted that by the end of 2011 nearly ~50% of my network
> traffic (mobile provider) can be served by IPv6 natively end to end.
> I think a lot of folks that measure Facebook and Google (including
> YouTube)  traffic today can see how that is feasible given current
> volumes and rates of growth.  Hence, the viability of IPv6-only
> endpoints (especially mobile) with NAT64/DNS64 as truly connecting the
> IPv4 long-tail remaining 50% that will continue to shrink as more
> major sites follow the CNN's path.
>
> Cameron
> =======
> http://groups.google.com/group/tmoipv6beta
> =======
>




More information about the NANOG mailing list