Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming

Daniel Holme dan.holme at
Sat Nov 20 08:15:48 CST 2010

On 20 Nov 2010, at 13:42, Daniel Holme <dan.holme at> wrote:

> On 19 November 2010 13:14, Scott Morris <swm at> wrote:
>> If 8 bits is a byte, then 16 bits should be a mouthful.
> I like that, but maybe a chomp (although that might annoy some perl &
> ruby people)... then maybe when all 2bytes are zeros and we expel them
> from the address with a double colon, we should call that a fart.

On a more serious note, apologies for throwing in more suggestions this late in the game. Especially now some documentation has been drafted, but has anybody thought of using 'munch' for 2bytes. It just seems to ring right for me.

Daniel Holme

More information about the NANOG mailing list