experience with equinix exchange

Ryan Finnesey ryan.finnesey at HarrierInvestments.com
Fri Nov 19 21:42:03 CST 2010


I would like to know the issues as well because we are looking to going
into at least 4 of their centers.
Cheers
Ryan


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert E. Seastrom [mailto:rs at seastrom.com] 
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 3:30 AM
To: Justin Horstman
Cc: nanog at nanog.org; Mehmet Akcin
Subject: Re: experience with equinix exchange


Paul is pretty clueful; I think he was asking for specifics as to what
the layer 8/9 issues are at Equinix, rather than an explanation of what
layer 8 and 9 means.

"Fly Fast",

-r


Justin Horstman <justin.horstman at gorillanation.com> writes:

> 8 users
> 9 politics and policies
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Paul WALL [mailto:pauldotwall at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 10:55 AM
>> To: Mehmet Akcin
>> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: experience with equinix exchange
>> 
>> What are the layer 8-9 issues?
>> 
>> Drive Slow,
>> Paul Wall
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote:
>> >
>> >> Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with their exchange at
>> any of
>> >> their major datacenters, especially Great Oaks? We're wondering if
>> people
>> >> really love or hate it.
>> >>
>> >> -shac
>> >
>> >
>> > Equinix does a fair job running 7 layers , however the layer8 and
>> layer9 seem the lacking part
>> > which could have been improved greatly. in Great Oaks / SJC , they
>> seem to be the largest IX
>> >
>> > per
>> >
>> >
>> https://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=5&peerParticip
>> an tsPublicsOrder=Sorter_policy&peerParticipantsPublicsDir=DESC
>> >
>> > so being there while you are in that location seems good, and they
>> are reliable.
>> >
>> > mehmet
>> >





More information about the NANOG mailing list