IPv6 6to4 and dns

Mark Andrews marka at isc.org
Fri Nov 19 17:33:35 CST 2010


In message <4CE6D919.2000604 at mompl.net>, Jeroen van Aart writes:
> Mark Andrews wrote:
> > Firstly I would use a tunnel broker instead of 6to4.  Easier to
> > debug failures.
> 
> Thanks all for the helpful response. Using the same names for IPv6 and 
> IPv4 doesn't appear to be much of a problem, especially considering this 
> is a trial which concerns office/home ISP connectivity, for now.
> 
> Which IPv6 tunnel broker is preferable, or does it really matter?

I've been using HE for 7 years now and have always got a fast response
when I've had problems with the link.

> Thanks,
> Jeroen
> 
> -- 
> http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
> http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
> 
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org




More information about the NANOG mailing list