IPv6 6to4 and dns

Franck Martin franck at genius.com
Fri Nov 19 14:36:28 CST 2010

I use HE.NET in a few installations (with BGP) and they have good support (which is quite awesome for a free service).

As people pointed out avoid 6to4, Apple just rendered it nearly useless in its latest OS-X.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeroen van Aart" <jeroen at mompl.net>
To: "NANOG list" <nanog at nanog.org>
Sent: Saturday, 20 November, 2010 9:07:53 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 6to4 and dns

Mark Andrews wrote:
> Firstly I would use a tunnel broker instead of 6to4.  Easier to
> debug failures.

Thanks all for the helpful response. Using the same names for IPv6 and 
IPv4 doesn't appear to be much of a problem, especially considering this 
is a trial which concerns office/home ISP connectivity, for now.

Which IPv6 tunnel broker is preferable, or does it really matter?


More information about the NANOG mailing list