experience with equinix exchange

Justin Horstman justin.horstman at gorillanation.com
Thu Nov 18 13:01:45 CST 2010


8 users
9 politics and policies

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul WALL [mailto:pauldotwall at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 10:55 AM
> To: Mehmet Akcin
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: experience with equinix exchange
> 
> What are the layer 8-9 issues?
> 
> Drive Slow,
> Paul Wall
> 
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote:
> >
> >> Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with their exchange at
> any of
> >> their major datacenters, especially Great Oaks? We're wondering if
> people
> >> really love or hate it.
> >>
> >> -shac
> >
> >
> > Equinix does a fair job running 7 layers , however the layer8 and
> layer9 seem the lacking part
> > which could have been improved greatly. in Great Oaks / SJC , they
> seem to be the largest IX
> >
> > per
> >
> >
> https://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=5&peerParticipan
> tsPublicsOrder=Sorter_policy&peerParticipantsPublicsDir=DESC
> >
> > so being there while you are in that location seems good, and they
> are reliable.
> >
> > mehmet
> >





More information about the NANOG mailing list