owen at delong.com
Wed Nov 17 11:22:43 CST 2010
I think that the MTU on LO is pretty irrelevant in general.
If it does matter, larger is probably better.
On Nov 17, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Deric Kwok wrote:
> I just see that the mtu in lo is different from standard eth 1500
> Any meaning of it?
> Standard eth 1500
> in linux. lo mtu 16436
> in solaris. lo mtu is 8232
> How about cisco / juniper loopback?
> Thank you so much
More information about the NANOG