Low end, cool CPE.

Tim Chown tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri Nov 12 07:03:00 CST 2010

On 12 Nov 2010, at 12:55, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> This is far too diffuse.  You'll get a "yes, we've got IPv6".
> You should at least add
> - IPv6 packet filtering and policy management (at least simple access
>   lists) 
> <snip>
> The point is: We've been asking for "IPv6" for too long.  That's just
> one bit in a packet header.  We need to start asking for the features we
> expect, which is a lot more than that bit.

For IPv6 CPE requirements, you might want to look at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-07 and comment on the IETF v6ops list.   


More information about the NANOG mailing list