Quick IP6/BGP question
andy at nosignal.org
Mon May 24 18:50:58 UTC 2010
On 24 May 2010, at 19:21, Thomas Magill wrote:
> From the provider side, are most of you who are implementing IP6
> peerings running BGP over IP4 and just using IP6 address families to
> exchange routes or doing IP6 peering?
Different sessions, one for v4, one for v6. This keeps config saner, therefore debugging easier. It means you can split out your v4 and v6 edge in the future should you want to, without having to renumber and split out the sessions then.
More information about the NANOG