ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
bruns at 2mbit.com
Fri May 14 14:43:10 CDT 2010
(Sent from my Blackberry, please avoid the flames as I can't do inline quoting)
Native IPv6 is a crapshoot. About the only people in the US that I've seen that are no-bullshit IPv6 native ready is Hurricane Electric. NTT is supposedly as well but I can't speak as to where they have connectivity.
Being that there's issues that leave us unable to get native connectivity, we have a BGP tunnel thanks to HE (with a 20ms latency from Seattle to Freemont).
Tunnels suck if not done correctly. We sometimes have faster and more reliable connections through IPv6, so ymmv.
From: Jared Mauch
To: Jack Carrozzo
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
Sent: May 14, 2010 12:49 PM
I'm curious what providers have not gotten their IPv6 plans/networks/customer ports enabled.
I know that Comcast is doing their trials now (Thanks John!) and will be presenting at the upcoming NANOG about their experiences.
What parts of the big "I" Internet are not enabled or ready?
On May 14, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
> I agree - if you can get native v6 transit then more power to you. But
> tunnels are sure better than no IPv6 connectivity in my mind. Aside from
> slight performance/efficiency issues, I've never had an issue.
> -Jack Carrozzo
http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
More information about the NANOG